<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>David Campbell &#187; manipulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.david-campbell.org/tag/manipulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.david-campbell.org</link>
	<description>Photography, Multimedia, Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.4" -->
	<itunes:summary>Photography, Multimedia, Politics</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>David Campbell</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.david-campbell.org/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Photography, Multimedia, Politics</itunes:subtitle>
	
<cloud domain='www.david-campbell.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Who believes photographs?</title>
		<link>http://www.david-campbell.org/2011/09/16/who-believes-photographs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.david-campbell.org/2011/09/16/who-believes-photographs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidc7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Errol Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kiku Adatto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nan Goldin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.david-campbell.org/?p=2324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; # # Should we accept the oft-repeated view that nobody believes photographs anymore? # Skepticism about the veracity of images is widespread. In a recent interview with Art Info, Nan Goldin recalled: # I gave a talk at the Tate a couple of years ago, and I asked an audience of 200 people how...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.david-campbell.org/2011/09/16/who-believes-photographs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The aesthetics of the war in Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.david-campbell.org/2010/12/17/aesthetics-of-war-in-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.david-campbell.org/2010/12/17/aesthetics-of-war-in-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidc7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Gilbertson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damon Winter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Guttenfelder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Hurn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dorothea Lange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaith Abdul-Ahad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henri Cartier-Bresson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korengal Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Reinhardt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Shaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photojournalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sir Francis Bacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Hetherington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victor Blue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.david-campbell.org/?p=1598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; # # The US-led war in Afghanistan is one of the longest running conflicts in America’s history. After more than nine years, the US and its allies have been fighting in Afghanistan longer than Soviet Union was by the time of its 1989 withdrawal. The war in Afghanistan has also surpassed the formal duration...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.david-campbell.org/2010/12/17/aesthetics-of-war-in-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photographic manipulation: World Press Photo needs to be transparent in enforcing its rules</title>
		<link>http://www.david-campbell.org/2010/03/03/photographic-manipulation-world-press-photo-needs-to-be-transparent-in-enforcing-its-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.david-campbell.org/2010/03/03/photographic-manipulation-world-press-photo-needs-to-be-transparent-in-enforcing-its-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidc7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stepan Rudik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Press Photo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.david-campbell.org/?p=1032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in December last year I posted a commentary on World Press Photo&#8217;s new rule on &#8216;manipulation&#8217; of submitted imagery. The main point concerned the ambiguity of what “currently accepted standards in the industry” meant as the governing criterion. I concluded that &#8220;for the WPP clause to be effective, the organization is going to have...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.david-campbell.org/2010/03/03/photographic-manipulation-world-press-photo-needs-to-be-transparent-in-enforcing-its-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photographic manipulation: the new World Press Photo rule</title>
		<link>http://www.david-campbell.org/2009/12/06/photographic-manipulation-%e2%80%93-the-new-world-press-photo-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.david-campbell.org/2009/12/06/photographic-manipulation-%e2%80%93-the-new-world-press-photo-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidc7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photojournalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Press Photo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.david-campbell.org/?p=985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[World Press Photo has included a new clause about the manipulation of imagery in their entry rules for 2010. This clause says: # The content of the image must not be altered. Only retouching which conforms to currently accepted standards in the industry is allowed. The jury is the ultimate arbiter of these standards and...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.david-campbell.org/2009/12/06/photographic-manipulation-%e2%80%93-the-new-world-press-photo-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photographic retouching exposed</title>
		<link>http://www.david-campbell.org/2009/04/29/photographic-retouching-exposed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.david-campbell.org/2009/04/29/photographic-retouching-exposed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidc7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.david-campbell.org/?p=603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The issues surrounding photographic meaning, manipulation and Photoshop have been prominent recently (see my previous posts here and here, with some updates amongst the comments for each). # Via Fred Ritchin&#8217;s After Photography (see his 24 April post) comes news of a Swedish government project Girlpower dealing with sexism in advertising. # One element is...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.david-campbell.org/2009/04/29/photographic-retouching-exposed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photographic truth and Photoshop</title>
		<link>http://www.david-campbell.org/2009/04/17/photographic-truth-and-photoshop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.david-campbell.org/2009/04/17/photographic-truth-and-photoshop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidc7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klavs Bo Christensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.david-campbell.org/?p=543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photography’s anxiety about truth, manipulation and reality has been on show recently. In different ways and from different contexts, people have been asking: “how much Photoshop is too much”? # From the realm of fashion, French Elle is being celebrated for running a cover story in which the models photographs have not been ‘Photoshopped’ (thereby...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.david-campbell.org/2009/04/17/photographic-truth-and-photoshop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photographic truth and manipulation</title>
		<link>http://www.david-campbell.org/2009/02/23/photographic-truth-and-manipulation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.david-campbell.org/2009/02/23/photographic-truth-and-manipulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidc7</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.david-campbell.org/?p=457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We know photographs can be false yet we want them to be true. Indeed, the desire for photographic veracity has persisted, perhaps even intensified, even as knowledge about image manipulation becomes more widespread. # Reflecting on the Oscar ceremonies, MediaGuardian has documented the widespread use of Photoshop to enhance celebrity photographs in fashion and gossip...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.david-campbell.org/2009/02/23/photographic-truth-and-manipulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

